Deyvrone a écrit:Allocine viens de publier une anecdote bien sympa : http://www.allocine.fr/article/ficheart ... 25017.html
“I wanted the movie to have a mythological feeling," he says. "In ancient mythology, mass deaths are used to symbolize disasters. In other countries like Greece and Japan, myths were recounted through the generations, partly to answer unanswerable questions about death and violence. In America, we don’t have that legacy of ancient mythology. Superman is probably the closest we get. It’s a way of recounting the myth.”
NiradZedjati a écrit:Zack Snyder parle de la destruction massive et autres dommages collateraux dans MOS...“I wanted the movie to have a mythological feeling," he says. "In ancient mythology, mass deaths are used to symbolize disasters. In other countries like Greece and Japan, myths were recounted through the generations, partly to answer unanswerable questions about death and violence. In America, we don’t have that legacy of ancient mythology. Superman is probably the closest we get. It’s a way of recounting the myth.”
I really like Zack Snyder, both as a filmmaker and a person, but sometimes I am baffled by what comes out of his mouth. This is one of those times.
Kingdork a écrit:NiradZedjati a écrit:Zack Snyder parle de la destruction massive et autres dommages collateraux dans MOS...“I wanted the movie to have a mythological feeling," he says. "In ancient mythology, mass deaths are used to symbolize disasters. In other countries like Greece and Japan, myths were recounted through the generations, partly to answer unanswerable questions about death and violence. In America, we don’t have that legacy of ancient mythology. Superman is probably the closest we get. It’s a way of recounting the myth.”
Bon ça se confirme que Snyder est un peu teubé.
Où pour reprendre Devin Faraci au sujet de ce commentaire:I really like Zack Snyder, both as a filmmaker and a person, but sometimes I am baffled by what comes out of his mouth. This is one of those times.
"We were pretty sure that was going to be controversial, It's not like we were deluding ourselves, and we weren't just doing it to be cool. We felt, in the case of Zod, we wanted to put the character in an impossible situation and make an impossible choice. This is one area, and I've written comic books as well and this is where I disagree with some of my fellow comic book writers - 'Superman doesn't kill'. It's a rule that exists outside of the narrative and I just don't believe in rules like that. I believe when you're writing film or television, you can't rely on a crutch or rule that exists outside of the narrative of the film. So the situation was, Zod says 'I'm not going to stop until you kill me or I kill you.' The reality is no prison on the planet could hold him and in our film Superman can't fly to the moon, and we didn't want to come up with that crutch. Also our movie was in a way Superman Begins, he's not really Superman until the end of the film. We wanted him to have had that experience of having taken a life and carry that through onto the next films. Because he's Superman and because people idolise him he will have to hold himself to a higher standard."
Utilisateurs parcourant ce forum: Aucun utilisateur enregistré et 1 invité